Intel-based Mac sales started strong and have stayed strong ever since.
Obscure 2 pc review software#
Strategically, it was a bet that Macs could be sufficiently differentiated by the MacOS software platform and Apple’s hardware designs around the base Intel system architecture. Intel-based Macs would never be better or worse than the PC state of the art. I call these the most exciting new Macs, technically, since 1994 (when the first PowerPC Macs shipped, marking the start of the transition from Motorola’s 680x0 architecture), not 2006 (when the first Intel Macs shipped, marking the start of the transition from PowerPC) because while those Intel Macs were exciting insofar as they were new and completely different for the Mac, they were not different at all, system architecturally, from other Intel-based PCs.
Obscure 2 pc review pro#
You either know that the A2338 model number designates an M1 MacBook Pro or you have to turn it on to know it’s different. Which is to say that the most exciting new Macs from a technical perspective since 1994 don’t look new at all. There’s no marking anywhere on the exterior to tell this apart from an Intel MacBook Pro other than the very small print product number on the underside: “A2338”. Apple never went for those “Intel inside” stickers, and they’re not changing their stance for the M1 just because it’s their own chip.
(The M1-based 13-inch MacBook Pro is 0.1 pounds lighter than its Intel-based counterparts, however.) Same keyboard (it’s good), same trackpad, same aluminum color options (Silver and Space Gray). Same exact size and shape, down to the millimeter. I’ve been using an M1 13-inch MacBook Pro for the last week, and it is all but identical on the exterior to its Intel-based counterpart. None of these Macs look different from their Intel-based predecessors. Some people will remain in denial about what Apple has accomplished here for years. To acknowledge how good they are - and I am here to tell you they are astonishingly good - you must acknowledge that certain longstanding assumptions about how computers should be designed, about what makes a better computer better, about what good computers need, are wrong. Yet we are resistant to change.Īpple’s new Macs based on the M1 system on a chip, the first Macs based on Apple Silicon, are that sort of mind-bending better. But it gets to the heart of a certain universal cognitive dissonance inherent in mankind. It’s both intuitively and undeniably true.
0 kommentar(er)
